ETHC 445 Week 8 Assignment DeVry

ETHC 445 Week 8 Assignment DeVry

Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course:

https://www.coursetutor.us/product/ethc-445-week-8-assignment-devry/

ETHC 445 Week 8 Assignment DeVry

ETHC 445 Week 8 REFLECTIVE ASSIGNMENT

You began this session considering a moral-ethical dilemma you yourself faced that you either resolved or failed to resolve, but hopefully learned from. You may never have given much thought to ethical theory nor what ethical premises/paradigms you have unconsciously held.

Now that you’ve had an opportunity to explore ethics formally, create a reflective assessment. Revisit your ethical memoir: what ethical theory best applies to your experience? Which significant author you have studied most speaks to your own ethical paradigm as you are (re)forming it now? If you didn’t resolve your ethical dilemma when you experienced it, what would you do now and why?

Additionally, explore your process of transformation in this course. Discuss your experiences of the course, your beginnings, and where you are at now with your team or partners and create an oral presentation that reflectively assesses your learning experience and the collaborations you engaged in throughout this session. Are we a society of learners who greatly benefit from interactions? Or are we islands, whose individual systems and beliefs are exclusive to ourselves? [Note: You may find it useful to write your thoughts out in an essay form, but the essay is not required in the drop box. Instead, focus on visual and audio quality, poise, and grace in the execution of this assignment. Let your content and stylistic choices reign creatively, and let your message be compelling, persuasive, and convincing.]

Rubric

Reflective Assignment

Reflective Assignment
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssessment Content

Includes, but is not limited to the following: • Time spent in collaboration • Time spent on the course • Challenges encountered • Solutions • Research takeaway • Organization strategies with teams • Collaboration and the modern workplace • Overall value of the time spent

40.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisual Presentation Quality

Slides are attractive. Items are bulleted and spoken to (rather than typed out). Visual images are graceful and support the content.

30.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOral Presentation Quality

Student speaks with clarity, authority, and is eloquent. The audio is clear. The student does not sound as if s/he is reading a text, but is orally prepared and graceful, poised, and convincing.

30.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

30.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0

 

Download File Now


ETHC 445 Week 7 Assignment DeVry

ETHC 445 Week 7 Assignment DeVry

Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course:

https://www.coursetutor.us/product/ethc-445-week-7-assignment-devry/

ETHC 445 Week 7 Assignment DeVry

ETHC 445 Week 7 MAKE-UP WORK 

There is no new homework due this week. However, if your grade is not where you would like it to be, consult with your professor about revising an earlier assignment or creating a missing assignment. Revisions are to be substantive and show quality and improvement.

 

Download File Now


ETHC 445 Week 6 Assignment DeVry

ETHC 445 Week 6 Assignment DeVry

Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course:

https://www.coursetutor.us/product/ethc-445-week-6-assignment-devry/

ETHC 445 Week 6 Assignment DeVry

ETHC 445 Week 6 CASE STUDY ANALYSIS

Examine the Case Study for your analysis about professional responsibilities and decision-making during a crisis called “Command at Sea.” In teams or partners, discuss the decision possibilities within the case study and create a report of your findings. Be sure to read and understand the case thoroughly.

Rubric

Case Study Analysis

Case Study Analysis
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction

Writer summarizes the case, showing in-depth understanding and a compelling purpose for writing. Introduces possible perspectives to be detailed in the report.

30.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis Quality

Both team collaboration and individual critical thought are evident and are clearly and compellingly presented.

40.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, Style, Format, Quality of Thought

Grammar refers to correct Standard American Usage, e.g., subject/verb agreement and use of correct parts of speech. Mechanics refers to correct idiomatic usage, e.g., capitalized proper nouns, word choice, and word order. Style (5 pts) refers to dynamic writing, avoiding passive constructions, writing that shows, describes, and compels the reader’s interest. Evident care has been taken in composing; there are few errors, and they do not significantly interfere with meaning. APA format has been followed scrupulously.

30.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

30.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0

Download File Now


ETHC 445 Week 5 Assignment DeVry

ETHC 445 Week 5 Assignment DeVry

Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course:

https://www.coursetutor.us/product/ethc-445-week-5-assignment-devry/

ETHC 445 Week 5 Assignment DeVry

ETHC 445 Week 5 YOU DECIDE

The “You Decide” assignment presents a difficult and painful dilemma, with you in an imagined professional role. Go through the You Decide presentation, make the decision it calls for, meet you’re your team or partner to discuss, and compose a paper and presentation that explains your decision and your reasoning and justification for it.

You are called upon to make a painful medical decision and to explain it both orally and in writing.  Who benefits from what you decided, who gets denied a needed benefit, and why?  You will compose an official memorandum that will be kept for the record and could potentially be read not only by your Peer Review Committee, but also by those involved in charitable fundraising, which supports hospital development, as well as by others with financial interests in the decision.

You will see notice that there is time pressure in the simulated situation, so remember that you would not have the luxury to dawdle in the decision-making process, and as the decision-maker, you would not have the luxury of consulting a broad spectrum of advisors.  It falls on you and your team or partner to decide!

Include in the document and presentation the utilitarian ethical philosophy of John Stuart Mill (from the lecture and audio for this week) and one other ethical philosopher of your choosing that we have studied to date, and use both of those philosophies to bolster your decision. This paper will be at least 2 pages and no more than 3 pages with a 2-3 minute oral presentation on which you and your team or partner may (ideally and preferably) collaborate. Remember, both professional written form and potential audience, as well as tone when writing this sensitive memorandum.

Outside sources are not required, but if used, must be cited properly.

Rubric

You Decide

You Decide
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction

Writer summarizes a difficult situation sensitively and offers a compelling purpose for writing.

40.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport/Development

Course material and team or partner input is leveraged powerfully. Theoretical underpinnings are well understood and used to bring an argument/justification of choice forward. Both Locke and another philosopher are used.

50.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, Style, Format, Quality of Thought

Grammar refers to correct Standard American Usage, e.g., subject/verb agreement and use of correct parts of speech. Mechanics refers to correct idiomatic usage, e.g., capitalized proper nouns, word choice, and word order. Style (5 pts) refers to dynamic writing, avoiding passive constructions, writing that shows, describes, and compels the reader’s interest. Evident care has been taken in composing; there are few errors, and they do not significantly interfere with meaning. APA format has been followed scrupulously.

40.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisual Presentation
25.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOral Narration
20.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

20.0 pts
Total Points: 175.0

 

Download File Now


ETHC 445 Week 4 Assignment DeVry

ETHC 445 Week 4 Assignment DeVry

Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course:

https://www.coursetutor.us/product/ethc-445-week-4-assignment-devry/

ETHC 445 Week 4 Assignment DeVry

ETHC 445 Week 4 ACADEMIC SCHOLARSHIP

Using academic scholarly research, find an article that addresses an ethical dilemma from the past five years and annotate it thoroughly.  What are the key points to the article?  Summarize the dilemma.  What are the key terms of the article?  What conflicts or controversies does it raise?  Where can you offer analysis or an original point of view?  Once you have a handle on the article and your reaction to the issues it raises, use it as a foundation to

  1. Create your own 2-4 paragraph “dilemma.”
  2. Apply Kant’s Categorical Imperative to the problem you invent.
  3. Apply any other method you have encountered in lecture material and the readings.
  4. State which method you prefer and why.
  5. Work with a partner collaboratively to share and divide this work for optimal results.

Your paper should be 3 pages.  You MUST provide the source of the foundation dilemma, and thus this paper will require 1 reference using at least 1 correct in-text citation (indicating quoted or paraphrased material from the article and where to locate it).  Use APA format in citing the source.  Refer to course resources for details and help in achieving APA style.

Work with a partner to share this assignment collaboratively and create a combined oral presentation.  Consider creating a youtube video, MP3 podcast (if you have those skills) or a video presentation.

Rubric

Academic Scholarship

Academic Scholarship
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction

Writer provides a solid example of academic scholarship, related to a specific real-world problem. The source is written by a professional ethicist, scholar, appears in a peer-reviewed journal, and has ample references of its own.

30.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnnotation Quality

The writer annotates the source fully, considering the main points, key terms used (with in-text citation of pages); s/he analyzes content for implications, consequences, and subtle problems and controversies. S/he establishes points of agreement/disagreement and gives cause. S/he locates 1 or 2 pithy quotations that will serve as evidence in his/her analysis. Course material and team input is leveraged powerfully.

40.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, Style, Format, Quality of Thought

Grammar refers to correct Standard American Usage, e.g., subject/verb agreement and use of correct parts of speech. Mechanics refers to correct idiomatic usage, e.g., capitalized proper nouns, word choice, and word order. Style (5 pts) refers to dynamic writing, avoiding passive constructions, writing that shows, describes, and compels the reader’s interest. Evident care has been taken in composing; there are few errors, and they do not significantly interfere with meaning. APA format has been followed scrupulously.

35.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

35.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisual Presentation
25.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOral Narration
20.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

20.0 pts
Total Points: 150.0

Download File Now


ETHC 445 Week 3 Assignment DeVry

ETHC 445 Week 3 Assignment DeVry

Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course:

https://www.coursetutor.us/product/ethc-445-week-3-assignment-devry/

ETHC 445 Week 3 Assignment DeVry

ETHC 445 Week 3 GREATER GOOD ANALYSIS

Working in teams, consider the following three problems. In writing a paper about each problem, identify the consequences of the actions taken, and then determine whether the actions taken represented a greater good, who would benefit from the good, and whether the consequences ethically justify the decisions and actions.

The Mayor of a large city was given a free membership in an exclusive golf club by people who have received several city contracts. He also accepted gifts from organizations that have not done business with the City, but might in the future. The gifts ranged from $200 tickets to professional sports events to designer watches and jewelry.

A college instructor is pursuing her doctorate in night school. To gain extra time for her own studies, she gives her students the same lectures, the same assignments, and the same examinations semester after semester without the slightest effort to improve them.

Todd and Edna have been married for three years. They have had serious personal problems. Edna is a heavy drinker, and Todd cannot keep a job. Also, they have bickered and fought constantly since their marriage. Deciding that the way to overcome their problems is to have a child, they stop practicing birth control, and Edna becomes pregnant.

Using what you have learned from collaborations, discussions, and readings up to this week, explore your answers to these ethical dilemmas.  How would Locke have addressed or solved the problem? Explain how his ethics and the answer he may have given are different from or the same as yours.

Compose a 2 page paper and oral narration of 2 minutes, discussing all three ethical dilemmas in depth.

Rubric

Greater Good Analysis

Greater Good Analysis
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose

The analyses have clear purpose that begins with a solid introduction/thesis, and compels the reader forward.

30.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport/Development

Writer plumbs the depth of the ethical dilemmas with evident granular detail. Team input and course materials are leveraged powerfully and with reflective detail.

30.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, StyleDescription of criterion

Grammar refers to correct Standard American Usage, e.g., subject/verb agreement and use of correct parts of speech. Mechanics refers to correct idiomatic usage, e.g., capitalized proper nouns, word choice, and word order. Style refers to dynamic writing, avoiding passive constructions, writing that shows, describes, and compels the reader’s interest. Evident care has been taken in composing; there are few errors, and they do not significantly interfere with meaning.

30.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSlides
20.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOral Narration
15.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

15.0 pts
Total Points: 125.0

 

Download File Now


ETHC 445 Week 2 Assignment DeVry

ETHC 445 Week 2 Assignment DeVry

Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course:

https://www.coursetutor.us/product/ethc-445-week-2-assignment-devry/

ETHC 445 Week 2 Assignment DeVry

ETHC 445 Week 2 ETHICAL DILEMMA ANALYSIS

Collaborate with your team, using Cisco Spark, email, phone meetings, or any collaboration tool you find useful or prefer. In your collaboration, consider the ethical dilemmas below and select 1 in which to conduct a deep drill.

Ethical Dilemma 1: A newspaper columnist signs a contract with a newspaper chain. Several months later, she is offered a position with another newspaper chain, offering a higher salary. Because she would prefer making more money, she notifies the first chain that she is breaking her contract. The courts will decide the legality of her action, but what of the morality? Did the columnist behave ethically?

Ethical Dilemma 2: An airline pilot receives his regular medical checkup. The doctor discovers that he has developed a heart murmur. The pilot only has a month to go before he is eligible for retirement. The doctor knows this and wonders whether, under these unusual circumstances, she is justified in withholding information from the company regarding the pilot’s condition.

Ethical Dilemma 3: An office worker has had a record of frequent absence. He has used all his vacation and sick-leave days, and has frequently requested additional leave without pay. His supervisor and co-workers have expressed great frustration because his absenteeism has caused bottlenecks in paperwork, created low morale in the office, and required others to do his work in addition to their own. However, the individual believes he is entitled to take his earned time and additional time off without pay. Is he right?

Ethical Dilemma 4: Rhonda enjoys socializing with fellow employees at work, but their discussions usually consist of gossiping about other people, including several of her friends. At first, Rhonda feels uncomfortable talking in this way about people she is close to; but then she decides it does no real harm, and she feels no remorse for joining in.

In conjunction with the readings, and within your teams, decide which ethical dilemma you believe is most problematic and why. In your teams, discuss the ideas of “good vs. evil,” “wrong vs. right,” and “ought/should be vs. what is.” Form the readings, discuss the ways in which Augustine and Aquinas would have solved the problem based on lecture and course reading material. In what ways do Augustine and Aquinas differ and why?

You may wish to meet throughout the week to share ideas. Create a report of your findings as individuals and as a team. The report should be approximately 2 pages accompanied by a 2-minute oral presentation, using VoiceThread or a PowerPoint narrated slide show.

Rubric

Ethical Dilemma Analysis

Ethical Dilemma Analysis
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose

The paper has a clear purpose that begins with a solid introduction/thesis, and compels the reader forward.

25.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport/Development

The analysis shows depth of critical thought. Readings, collaborations, and course materials are leveraged powerfully in support of writer’s evident effort to understand ethical problems. Good use of theoretical underpinnings are used.

25.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, Style

Grammar refers to correct Standard American Usage, e.g., subject/verb agreement and use of correct parts of speech. Mechanics refers to correct idiomatic usage, e.g., capitalized proper nouns, word choice, and word order. Style refers to dynamic writing, avoiding passive constructions, writing that shows, describes, and compels the reader’s interest.

25.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSlides
15.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOral Narration
10.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

10.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0

 

Download File Now


ETHC 445 Week 1 Assignment DeVry

ETHC 445 Week 1 Assignment DeVry

Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course:

https://www.coursetutor.us/product/ethc-445-week-1-assignment-devry/

ETHC 445 Week 1 Assignment DeVry

ETHC 445 Week 1 ETHICAL MEMOIR

Compose a 2-page paper, accompanied by a 2-minute narrated slide presentation that describes a particular moral-ethical dilemma that you encountered and what the outcome of that dilemma was. Did you solve the dilemma? If so, how? If not, what were the repercussions or consequences? What would you do differently if faced with the same problem today? What is the importance of good ethics? Why should we be concerned about our actions?

Regard the questions as prompts, not an ordering of your responses. This is not a Q&A essay, but rather a graceful reflection regarding a difficult ethical dilemma you faced.

 

Download File Now


ETHC 445 Week 8 Complete DeVry

ETHC 445 Week 8 Complete DeVry

Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course:

https://www.coursetutor.us/product/ethc-445-week-8-complete-devry/

ETHC 445 Week 8 Final Exam DeVry

ETHC 445 Week 8 Discussion

WEEK 8: REFLECTION

This is our final week. Use this week’s threaded discussion and your collaborations together to draft a Reflective Assessment to be formally finalized for grade as an oral presentation.

This is a good time to be looking back over this course and thinking ahead to what comes next for you.

Courses like this one intend to expand your horizons by bringing new ideas and more refined ways of thinking about the kinds of decisions and commitments that you will make both in career and in life as a whole.

This course is Foundations of Ethics. Whatever you do and wherever you do it, you have gained tools of thinking and analysis that will serve you well. Keep these tools handy and at the forefront of your attention — whatever it is that will come into your hands in the future. You are far more equipped for leadership than you were a few short weeks ago.

So, here are a few questions for this final week in class to help you reflect for the last formal assignment:

  1. What of all that you have learned and practiced in this class will make the most significant impact(s) in your study of your declared major here at DeVry and in your career as you envision it?
  2. How might this course experience connect with and inform what you are looking forward to learning more about throughout your education and career as a lifelong learner?
  3. Consider how one learns: how much learning is individual? How much learning is socially achieved by discussing with one or more people in a variety of roles?
  4. To what extent is knowledge something one finds? To what extent is knowledge something one creates through interpretation, application, and analysis?
  5. What are the differences between information and knowledge?

ETHC 445 Week 8 REFLECTIVE ASSIGNMENT

You began this session considering a moral-ethical dilemma you yourself faced that you either resolved or failed to resolve, but hopefully learned from. You may never have given much thought to ethical theory nor what ethical premises/paradigms you have unconsciously held.

Now that you’ve had an opportunity to explore ethics formally, create a reflective assessment. Revisit your ethical memoir: what ethical theory best applies to your experience? Which significant author you have studied most speaks to your own ethical paradigm as you are (re)forming it now? If you didn’t resolve your ethical dilemma when you experienced it, what would you do now and why?

Additionally, explore your process of transformation in this course. Discuss your experiences of the course, your beginnings, and where you are at now with your team or partners and create an oral presentation that reflectively assesses your learning experience and the collaborations you engaged in throughout this session. Are we a society of learners who greatly benefit from interactions? Or are we islands, whose individual systems and beliefs are exclusive to ourselves? [Note: You may find it useful to write your thoughts out in an essay form, but the essay is not required in the drop box. Instead, focus on visual and audio quality, poise, and grace in the execution of this assignment. Let your content and stylistic choices reign creatively, and let your message be compelling, persuasive, and convincing.]

Rubric

Reflective Assignment

Reflective Assignment
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssessment Content

Includes, but is not limited to the following: • Time spent in collaboration • Time spent on the course • Challenges encountered • Solutions • Research takeaway • Organization strategies with teams • Collaboration and the modern workplace • Overall value of the time spent

40.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisual Presentation Quality

Slides are attractive. Items are bulleted and spoken to (rather than typed out). Visual images are graceful and support the content.

30.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOral Presentation Quality

Student speaks with clarity, authority, and is eloquent. The audio is clear. The student does not sound as if s/he is reading a text, but is orally prepared and graceful, poised, and convincing.

30.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

30.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0

Download File Now


ETHC 445 Week 7 Complete DeVry

ETHC 445 Week 7 Complete DeVry

Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course:

https://www.coursetutor.us/product/ethc-445-week-7-complete-devry/

ETHC 445 Week 7 Wrapping it up and Making it personal DeVry

ETHC 445 Week 7 Discussions

WEEK 7: CODES OF ETHICS

Each week, you may use the threads to draft your current work, interact with your peers, document the progress you have made as a result of your team collaborations, and address course content using the topics below. Please refer to the threaded discussion rubric, so that you are in full compliance.

This week, we looked at two more ethical codes—one for the Project Management Institute, and one for Engineers.
(Find links to these professional codes in the Week 7 Assignment tab along with the Week 7 readings.)

You can see that both of them are much simpler than the Legal code we looked at last week, and even simpler than the Medical code of ethics. Appropriate professional behavior, practice, and discipline varies among professions and reflects the needs and values of the professional society in question.

Let’s then assume professional roles as we work on this fictional scenario:

It’s 2020, and General Foryota Company opens a plant in which to build a new mass-produced hover-craft. This hover-craft will work using E-85 Ethanol, will travel up to 200 mph, and will reduce pollution worldwide at a rate of 10 percent per year. It is likely that when all automobiles in the industrial world have been changed over to hovercrafts, emission of greenhouse gasses may be so reduced that global warming may end and air quality will become completely refreshed.

However, the downside is that during the transition time, GFC’s Hover-Vee (only available in red or black), will most likely put all transportation as we know it in major dissaray. Roadways will no longer be necessary, but new methods of controlling traffic will be required. Further, while the old version of cars are still being used, Hover-vee’s will cause accidents, parking issues, and most likely class envy and warfare. The sticker price on the first two models will be about four times that of the average SUV (to about $200,000.) Even so, GFC’s marketing futurists have let them know that they will be able to pre-sell their first three years of expected production, with a potential waiting list which will take between 15 and 20 years to fill.

The Chief Engineer of GFC commissions a study on potential liabilities for the Hover-vees. The preliminary result is that Hover-vees will likely kill or maim humans at an increased rate of double to triple over automobile travel because of collisions and crashes at high speeds — projected annual death rates of 100,000 to 200,000. However, global warming will end, and the environment will flourish.

The U. S. Government gets wind of the plans. Congress begins to discuss the rules on who can own and operate Hover-vees. GFC’s stock skyrockets. The Chief Engineer takes the results of the study to the Chief Legal Counsel, and together they agree to bury the study, going forward with the production plans. The Chief Project Manager, who has read the study and agreed to bury it, goes ahead and plans out the project for the company, with target dates and production deadlines.

Our class is a team of young lawyers, project managers, engineers, and congressional aides who are all part of the process of helping get this project off the ground. In fact, according to the first letter of your last name, you are the following team:

A-G: Attorney on the GFC team
H-N: Project Manager on the GFC team
0-S: Engineer on the GFC team
T-Z: Congressional Aide

Somebody sent a secret copy of the report to you at your home address. It has no information in it at all, except for the report showing the proof of the increase in accidents and deaths. The report shows, on its face, that the CLO, CE, CPM, and your Congressional Representative have seen copies of this report. On the front there are these words typed in red: They knew — they buried this. Please save the world!

Each of you feel a very loyal tie to your boss and your company/country. You all have mortgages, and families to feed. It is likely if you blow the whistle on this report, you will lose your job and your livelihood. You’re not even sure who wrote the study in your envelope or who actually sent it to you.

Now to the task at hand:
Utilizing your profession’s code of ethics, what would be your first step? Who would you talk to first? Would you go to the press? Would you go to your boss? Should you do anything at all?

 

WEEK 7: PERSONAL ETHICS

Please be sure to read the Week Seven Lesson in its entirety before posting to this discussion.

This week we will work on creating your own statement of personal ethics.
To get started, read summarizing review of our great and famous ethics and what they have taught us — found in our lecture this week.

Then, let’s work on creating one for you.

Your goal for the end of this thread is to have created a personal ethical philosophy and be able to tell your classmates from which philosophies you created it and why the contents are important and meaningful for you. List its precepts. (You will need to do this on the Final Exam.)

After you have assembled and posted your personal ethics statement, responded to what others may have said to you and thought about what you have posted to others, then take your statement and use it to work through the famous case of the Ring of Gyges.

One of the great examples of ethics and morals in all of literature comes from Plato who wrote about the Ring of Gyges in
The Republic, Book II, starting at paragraph 359a.
For those who wish to read the whole story, it is in the Doc Sharing tab and here is a link to the story — Ring of Gyges (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

The story goes that Gyges was a shepherd in the service of the King. In a most unusual circumstance he came upon a dead man, removed the man’s ring, and discovered that it made him invisible. He conspired to take the periodic report of the shepherds to the King — once there he seduced the Queen and eventually took control of the Kingdom by conspiring with the Queen. Plato continues the story:

“Suppose now that there were two such magic rings, and the just put on one of them and the unjust the other; no man can be imagined to be of such an iron nature that he would stand fast in justice. No man would keep his hands off what was not his own when he could safely take what he liked out of the market, or go into houses and lie with any one at his pleasure, or kill or release from prison whom he would, and in all respects be like a God among men. Then the actions of the just would be as the actions of the unjust; they would both come at last to the same point. And this we may truly affirm to be a great proof that a man is just, not willingly or because he thinks that justice is any good to him individually, but of necessity, for wherever any one thinks that he can safely be unjust, there he is unjust. For all men believe in their hearts that injustice is far more profitable to the individual than justice, and he who argues as I have been supposing, will say that they are right.”

This story raises up the question of what sanctions prevent people from just taking any liberties they are inclined to take.
The whole subject of ethics, seen in large scale, is that of accepting and living under moral standards.

  1. Using YOUR personal ethical statement that you have created, what would you do if you had that second ring?
    2. What else within this course helps in responding to this fictitious situation or in explaining it?
    3. Respond to your classmates’ posts. Are they holding true to their own personal ethical philosophies in their resolutions of this dilemma?

Pick one or more of the above, and post below!
Imagine that! ;o)

ETHC 445 Week 7 MAKE-UP WORK 

There is no new homework due this week. However, if your grade is not where you would like it to be, consult with your professor about revising an earlier assignment or creating a missing assignment. Revisions are to be substantive and show quality and improvement.

 

Download File Now